On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:16:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2005/11/14, j l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Here is one who does not miss info at all. man was
>>> there so why reinvent the wheel?
>>
>> Right, but the problem is if manual says only "see info".
>>
>> --
>> Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> www.archlinux.org | www.juvepoland.com
>
>Easy answer...-> the author is a goof. i.e. Info files are not the
>PRIMARY standard, man files are, therefore it makes little sense to do
>things that way.

AFAIK GNU has standardised on info, not man[1] (I don't particularly
thing that's a good thing, but it seems to be the way it is). Yes, many
info documents are available online, however in some cases they
aren't available in nice browsable formats[2].

That Arch lacks info is a drawback (I haven't installed Arch yet), but
it doesn't deter me from installing Arch. If I miss info I'll have to
look into putting something together myself.

/M

1. http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/ (first sentence)
2. http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/index.html (comment on
   HTML)

-- 
Magnus Therning                    (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://therning.org/magnus

Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.

A picture is worth a thousand words; unfortunately, it consumes the
bandwidth of ten thousand words.

Attachment: pgpNJzfhi3lJZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to