Am Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 08:25 schrieb Benoit Chesneau: > Hi, > > Just a talk. But it seems there are more and more patchs in pkgbuilds > and this now very difficult to check packages or such things like > customize a package for specific needs. At least if patchs would be > documented it would be usefull. Anyway I thought that one principle of > Arch Linux was simplicity and the less patch as possible. What is the > position right now ? > > One other point I dislike is the the lack of transparency about upgrade > or major changes in architecture like udev, initscripts, hal, kernel > that we had in last months. This changes should be coumminicated before > the release of the package, and package should be always tested before > and put in testing to do it in my opininion. This last point should be > for all packages. For example if we take php package we see 5 changes in > 10 days and package is always updated in current.... That's shouldn't > be... What about people that works with it... Not everybody coule be a > tester everyday.... > > > Anyway, archlinux stay the best distribution I've found for now, but I > think these points should be solved to my mind. What do you think about > it ? > > > - Benoît > Webmaster, http://archlinuxfr.org > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch Hi kernel and udev changes are done in testing atm, so i don't see a problem here. The packages in testing are tested on developer pc's. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpu86urL6Yop.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
