> Point taken, but: > > Why not call it apache-httpd then? > > 'httpd' remains a very generic word.
This has been the name of the Apache Foundation's webserver for quite a while now. It is standard, and easily recognizable as such. It would venture to guess that it would cause more problems for many of the server admins out there to change the name of it to something that is less standardized and quickly recognizable. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
