2007/9/4, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 9/4/07, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Point taken, but: > > > > > > Why not call it apache-httpd then? > > > > > > 'httpd' remains a very generic word. > > > > This has been the name of the Apache Foundation's webserver for quite > > a while now. > > It is standard, and easily recognizable as such. > > > > It would venture to guess that it would cause more problems for many > > of the server admins out there to change the name of it to something > > that is less standardized and quickly recognizable. > > > > well those guys refer to their own project as "The Apache HTTP Server > project" (http://httpd.apache.org/), so well... oh, what the hey. :) >
That's the same as Apache Tomcat or Adobe Photoshop. :-P -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
