Sergej Pupykin wrote: > >> I see /srv in filesystem package. > >> > >> What about www root? What decision was reached? > >> > >> RK> For reference: >> RK> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1857 >> RK> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5876 >> RK> Could we finally do the change? >> RK> Any objections on http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1857#comment14860 ? > > About 1857#comment14860: > I think /srv/www/html symlink, not /srv/www and install all web-related > packages into /srv/www/<package>. Because there is at least /srv/ftp and > /srv/mp3(for streaming server) > > So if nobody against it, I'll start to move my http-related packages to /srv. > > mediawiki - /srv/www/mediawiki > dokuwiki - /srv/www/dokuwiki > punbb - /srv/www/punbb > apache13 - /srv/www/apache13 > etc. > > supposing /srv/www/html is a symlink to web server default www root. > > Any suggestions? >
What about not using a documentroot? These things are usually useless anyway. Almost everybody deletes those default pages that come with for example apache. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
