On 9/5/07, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >DP> Wednesday 05 September 2007, Dan McGee wrote: > >DP> | This is something for namcap to check- as far as I can think, > >DP> | makepkg does not enforce any packaging standards or such things > >DP> | currently so I don't want to clutter it. > > >DP> i second this! makepkg is not the way to limit this. > > Hm. I am not familar with python :S > > So, is it consensus?
Yes, considering that makepkg currently enforces 0 of our packaging rules, and is used by people who don't use arch, it's silly to enforce arch rules. In addition, what if I wanted to make an installable package for my homedir containing config files - silly, but someone might want that /shrug. Let namcap do it, as namcap is an arch specific tool _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
