2007/9/6, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 9/5/07, Sergej Pupykin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >DP> Wednesday 05 September 2007, Dan McGee wrote: > > >DP> | This is something for namcap to check- as far as I can think, > > >DP> | makepkg does not enforce any packaging standards or such things > > >DP> | currently so I don't want to clutter it. > > > > >DP> i second this! makepkg is not the way to limit this. > > > > Hm. I am not familar with python :S > > > > So, is it consensus? > > Yes, considering that makepkg currently enforces 0 of our packaging > rules, and is used by people who don't use arch, it's silly to enforce > arch rules. > > In addition, what if I wanted to make an installable package for my > homedir containing config files - silly, but someone might want that > /shrug.
And we have 'filesystem' package which contains all these directories. :-P > > Let namcap do it, as namcap is an arch specific tool > -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
