2007/9/7, Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Wanted to briefly inquire about KVM, for all those out there who use > it for virtualization. > > At first Arch used KVM modules in the kernel, then we switched over > to trying external ones, then we switched back to using the kernel ones. > > This seems to me, anyway, to be for pretty good reason: I tried > building the kvm 36 release against our kernel. Stuff went very well > for a while and seemed fast, but while I was running a vm, my entire > screen went black and my machine hung hard; I had to reboot. Pretty bad! > > So my question: Has anyone had experiences with KVM that suggest we > should be doing anything other than staying with the modules in the > kernel? They may not be the latest and greatest, but they seem to be > pretty stable. It seems to me like the right balance of > > Please share any thoughts/experiences you may have had. >
Additionally I'd like to know if anyone had experience with running in-kernel bundled kvm modules but with latest userspace patch. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
