Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2007 09:15, Roman Kyrylych a écrit : > 2007/9/7, Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Wanted to briefly inquire about KVM, for all those out there who use > > it for virtualization. > > > > At first Arch used KVM modules in the kernel, then we switched over > > to trying external ones, then we switched back to using the kernel ones. > > > > This seems to me, anyway, to be for pretty good reason: I tried > > building the kvm 36 release against our kernel. Stuff went very well > > for a while and seemed fast, but while I was running a vm, my entire > > screen went black and my machine hung hard; I had to reboot. Pretty bad! > > > > So my question: Has anyone had experiences with KVM that suggest we > > should be doing anything other than staying with the modules in the > > kernel? They may not be the latest and greatest, but they seem to be > > pretty stable. It seems to me like the right balance of > > > > Please share any thoughts/experiences you may have had. > > Additionally I'd like to know if anyone had experience with running > in-kernel bundled kvm modules but with latest userspace patch.
I'm actually using the bundled kvm modules (under Arch32), with the userspace from kvm-33. I've got no matter with it. I personally, found it more intereting to have kvm modules in a separate package, but that would involve releasing qemu more often too (or have a qemu-kvm package) -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/ _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
