On 9/21/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:58:38PM -0500, Mark Schneider wrote: > > On 9/21/07, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mister Dobalina schrieb: > > > > Now that gcc/gcc-libs is split, does it matter what > > > > order they are built in? Should it be > > > > build,install,build,install or > > > > build,build,install,install? > > > > > > Doesn't matter. Right now, a complete gcc bootstrap is done when > > > building each of them. This takes a lot longer, but results in clean > > > packages. > > > > > > Right now, makepkg cannot build split packages, therefore this is the > > > best way. > > > > > > > I apologize if this has been discussed prior, but are there future > > plans for makepkg to build split packages? > > > > There is a recent feature request about it, including a patch : > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7982 > > And also a beginning of discussion on pacman-dev ML : > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/009380.html > > So it might be not totally hopeless.
Yeah there's another FR with a similar patch. We have three ongoing systems and none of them.... feel quite right. More input is needed 8) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
