People, people, please, let's be reasonable: having the *possibility* of split packages doesn't mean *we'll* split in -dev and -doc and etc. It could be *possible* yes, but just make a policy saying: "don't split packages in xxx-dev and xxx" and we're good. And obviously don't allow that in the main repos. There will be people making it in AUR, yes that will be, but that's AUR. I think we should let split packages come for what it is good for: installing k3b without having to install whole kde, or mono without gnome, etc. Of course it could be done using your own PKGBUILD but if you forget to --ignore it, you loose all your work. I think that's the ideia of the devs when they proposed it, and I think that if used right, could make Arch even better.
We can make bombs out of nuclear tecnology? Yes, but also power plants.... -- Cheers, Rodrigo A computer is like air conditioning: it becomes useless when you open windows. ~Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch