On Oct 28, 2007 3:55 PM, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Samstag, 27. Oktober 2007 16:24 Damir Perisa wrote: > > > | In my opinion, if a texlive 2007.10 is out, arch devs should be at > > | work... but not just to replace one or two outdated latex packages > > | in the distribution. > > > > of course this would be best > > Contacting the author or writing a bug report could be a solution too. > > > my point was only that if the latex beamer is broken in the texlive > > pkg, and there is no official distribution update, we (the maintainer > > of texlive) can update/patch the beamer to work. > > Than we have to split the packages but maintaining the whole texlive package > is from my view hard enough. I don't see a easy solution if the people behind > texlive don't update their own server with the newer ones from ctan. > > I suggest that go to the forum and discuss this there because than firmicus > get involved. > > See you, Attila > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >
Not sure if this is related, but I encountered a problem with pgf being "missing" and the solution was to install texlive-pictures, bug #8483[1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8483 _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
