I have a question about conceptual modeling in CIDOC CRM, maybe there is
someone one the list who is able to provide some guidance.
As posted before, we are trying to integrate research data of neolithic
sites into Arches. Now, naturally a significant part of this data has a
level of "certainty" to which the information is correct. e.g. a site
can consist of some features for certain (in this case modeled in the
Archaeological Heritage (Site).E27 - Component.E18 relationship) but if
others exist is uncertain. We believe this valuable information should
not get lost (quite often theory construction is based on such information).
For example it could be uncertain if an archaeological feature is to be
named "pit" or "ditch" - or if it exists at all. Another example could
be the questionable relationship of a findspot to a certain
archaeological period. To make it even more difficult, different authors
could have different thoughts on that.
As far as we can see, the expression of such "uncertainty" is not
covered by Arches yet. Is there a concept for the integration of such
data in the future? We are currently thinking into potential solutions
but are struggeling to find adequate expressions for uncertain
information in CIDOC.
thanks, Thomas
--
-- To post, send email to archesproject@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe, send
email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more information,
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
