It seems there are problems with our automated docker builds, which is
presumably the cause of the 4.4.1 tag not existing.

Latest build of the master branch failed: the Elasticsearch endpoint cannot
be reached during the unit tests.
Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or service not known)

https://cloud.docker.com/u/archesproject/repository/registry-1.docker.io/archesproject/arches/builds/ca27a312-4d02-4e1b-b65c-2f34cb22ef79


Not sure why this is, as the Elasticsearch container seems to be up and
running during the test.

Full command: run_tests
Command: run_tests
Testing if database server is up...
Database server is up
Testing if Elasticsearch is up...
Elasticsearch is up

However, the 4.4.1 build does not seem be have been triggered at all, and
I'm at a loss as to why this hasn't happened...
Possibly someone with more permissions than me could check the webhook
settings in the Github repo? :)

Vincent

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:40 AM Ben O'Steen <bost...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> - As for Docker 4.4.1 not being put onto Docker Hub, I'm not sure why that
> is. I've been making my own images of the codebase in lieu of that.
>
> - I don't get the System settings errors you mention, though I am using
> Arches based on a much more recent codebase (I created my Arches base image
> last week or so from the master branch).
>
> Ben
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:39, Matthias Bussonnier <
> bussonniermatth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ben,
>>
>> That was useful, I guess I got confused between DEV mode 8000 and PROD
>> port 80, I got it to work now.
>>
>> 2 followup questions; now that I can see the website and login:
>>   - I see on dockerhub that 4.4.1 has not been published; is that
>> expected ?
>>   - once logged-in I can't seem to access any of the 3 "System settings"
>> pages, they give me a 500,  Is that expected ? (I haven't managed to get
>> both my deployment working and django to spit out a traceback, otherwise I
>> would give up more info)
>>
>> I'm happy to start this as another thread if this is better suited.
>> --
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 10:12, Ben O'Steen <bost...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I should also make it clear that all of what I mentioned above is the
>>> default behaviour and doesn't need you to do anything more to make it work.
>>>
>> --
> -- To post, send email to archesproject@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe,
> send email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more
> information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Arches Project" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- To post, send email to archesproject@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe, send 
email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more information, 
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to