Hi Janaka,

Immediate/blocking requirements were fixed in 1.0.1 branch[1] and we will
do a patch release of 1.0.0. All the features and major improvements will
go with 1.1.0 and has planed to release at least an Alpha by the end of Q1.
[2], [3] and [4] issues reported by Chandana have already been fixed in [1].

/Ruchira

[1] https://github.com/wso2/enterprise-store/tree/es-1.0.1-apm-reg
[2] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/STORE-391
[3] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/STORE-394
[4] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/STORE-395


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Janaka Ranabahu <jan...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Will these limitations get fixed in the upcoming release? If so do we have
> a timeline for that?
>
> Thanks,
> Janaka
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Chandana Napagoda <chand...@wso2.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Samisa
>>
>> In addition to above issue, ES is still not supporting all the RXT
>> configuration elements(ex: unbounded table option) which are currently
>> supported by G-Reg. We have reported JIRAs to get those added to coming up
>> releases.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chandana
>>
>>
>> On Mar 8, 2014 7:09 AM, "Janaka Ranabahu" <jan...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Samisa,
>>>
>>> IMO, it should be ES. But the current ES architecture does not pick new
>>> RXT types automatically and some configurations to jaggery config files are
>>> required to show the new asset in both Store and Publisher[1]. Until we
>>> have a more flexible way of generating the Store and Publisher UI, I
>>> believe we have to stick with G-Reg.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Janaka
>>>
>>> [1] https://docs.wso2.org/display/ES100/Adding+a+New+Asset+Type
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <sam...@wso2.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> We used to position G-Reg as a store of anything with RXT.
>>>>
>>>> Now what ES is there, and is more capable, do we propose the users use
>>>> ES or G-Reg RXT like use cases?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Samisa...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Samisa Abeysinghe
>>>>
>>>> Vice President Developer Evangelism
>>>>
>>>> WSO2 Inc.
>>>> http://wso2.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Janaka Ranabahu*
>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>
>>>
>>> * E-mail: jan...@wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**M: **+94 718370861
>>> <%2B94%20718370861>*
>>>
>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Janaka Ranabahu*
> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>
>
> * E-mail: jan...@wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**M: **+94 718370861
> <%2B94%20718370861>*
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> Architecture@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 

*Ruchira Wageesha**Associate Technical Lead*
*WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware |  wso2.com <http://wso2.com>*

*email: ruch...@wso2.com <ruch...@wso2.com>,   blog:
ruchirawageesha.blogspot.com <http://ruchirawageesha.blogspot.com>,
mobile: +94 77 5493444*
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to