Hi all, @Senaka - Thanks for your input. Yes, that makes sense to keep few methods for default lifecycle and change other methods like getLcNames to return an array [ ]. I'll do these modifications.
+1 for having independent lifecycles. If there needs to be any connection between two lifecycles that has to be in implementation level of the lifecycles. The framework has to support independent multiple lifecycles. Agree with Senaka, that in case of services, it can be in store regardless of it development state.
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list Architecture@wso2.org https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
