We've addressed this by querying the backend for a Resource before clicking the 
"Publish All" button. The following SQL code has been embedded into an Excel 
worksheet with prompt for the Resource Identifier ( WHERE T8.root_record_id=?) 
and then displays a list of archival object unittitles with a Publish? status 
of 1 for published, 0 for unpublished. You could certainly just drop in the 
resource identifier in the SQL below.

I can provide more information about how I set this up in Excel offline if 
anyone's interested.


SELECT
    CONCAT(T9.value, " ", T6.indicator) AS `Container`,
    T8.component_id AS `Level`,
    T8.display_string AS `Component Title`,
     T8.publish AS `Publish?`
     FROM archivesspace.archival_object T8
     LEFT OUTER JOIN archivesspace.instance T1
     ON T1.archival_object_id=T8.id
     LEFT JOIN archivesspace.sub_container T2
     ON T1.id = T2.instance_id
     LEFT JOIN archivesspace.top_container_link_rlshp T3
     ON T2.id = T3.sub_container_id
     LEFT OUTER JOIN archivesspace.top_container T6
     ON T3.top_container_id = T6.id
     LEFT JOIN archivesspace.top_container_housed_at_rlshp T4
     ON T4.top_container_id = T6.id
     LEFT JOIN archivesspace.location T5
     ON T4.location_id = T5.id
     LEFT JOIN archivesspace.enumeration_value T9
     ON T6.type_id=T9.id
     WHERE T8.root_record_id=?
     ORDER by T8.publish, T9.value, T8.component_id ASC


Karen D. Miller
Monographic Cataloger/Metadata Specialist
Northwestern University Libraries
Northwestern University
1970 Campus Drive
Evanston, IL 60208
www.library.northwestern.edu
k-mill...@northwestern.edu
874.467.3462




From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org> On Behalf Of Kennedy, 
Nancy
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 8:55 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group <archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Publish All workflows

Thanks, Noah, Brian.

Noah - re: "we keep track of the publication status of a finding aid using the 
Finding Aid Status field" .  We do the same thing, using Finding Aid Status to 
drive the EAD export.

Using FA Status has worked pretty well... except that screen labels like 
"publish?" leads to some (I'd say legitimately!) confused users.  Especially 
when there is, say, a network slow down and people try to troubleshoot by 
clicking on lots of inviting buttons... like "publish all".  We try to train 
everyone on what "Publish?" checkbox means, but it's easy to confuse.

I've considered relabeling the ''Publish?" field to something like 'External 
Audience' ... but I don't want to move us far afield form the core 
archivesspace code/documentation. If I change the display label, my users will 
understand that we mean audience and not status .  The problem is changing 
labels means our views will drift away from the main core archivesspace 
documentation, screencasts etc.  And the term 'publish" appears in many places. 
Label translation seems like a band aid (and not a very good one).   A 2nd 
element specific to audience would probably be much better than a label change.

Nancy

From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
 On Behalf Of Brian Thomas
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:22 AM
To: 'Archivesspace Users Group' 
<archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Publish All workflows

Hi all,
I cannot speak to Noah's questions re how to keep track of published vs. 
unpublished elements as I am more on the techy side here in electronic records 
v. the processing side. But I wanted to voice an agreement with Nancy that 
having an internal audience only checkbox that blocks publication would be a 
good enhancement. That way one can in a fell swoop still publish all things 
intended for the public, without having to go back and unpublish all the things 
that should not have been.
Thanks,

Brian Thomas
Electronic Records Specialist
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
1201 Brazos Street
Austin, TX 78701
PH: (512) 475-3374
e-mail: btho...@tsl.texas.gov
tsl.texas.gov<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tsl.texas.gov_&d=DwMFAg&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=P54V6LrXJP5Ddzc8ZItBdqB1Kr3elvFIQ04P7n0UCbQ&m=wXWWUted2bfeFlf8v-RL-LFPSbkncZiHLV7yaSspRB0&s=sjzffyN-QTGW6yA1YnXuMu4viWm-dY21BcZciwiYs6k&e=>
[cid:image001.jpg@01D029A2.37194C70]

From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
 On Behalf Of Noah Huffman
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 8:10 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group 
<archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Publish All workflows

Hi Nancy,

We ran into a similar problem to the one you describe-folks accidentally 
clicking "publish all" when a resource record contained some archival objects 
that should remain unpublished.

To try to prevent this, we have a general local practice that if a resource 
record contains any archival objects that should remain unpublished (internal 
only), then we make a note of that in the Repository Processing Note field. The 
Repository Processing Note is an internal-only field and fairly easy to review 
before clicking "publish all."  We also have some scripts that batch export 
EADs and publish all at the same time.  Those scripts will print out the 
content of the Repository Processing Note field and require confirmation before 
proceeding.  This isn't a fail-proof solution, but has helped mitigate the 
problem of publishing things we didn't intend to publish. We're also not 
currently using the ASpace PUI, so we have at least some mediation before 
publishing records as EAD.

RE: the audience vs. publish distinction, we keep track of the publication 
status of a finding aid using the Finding Aid Status field (e.g. in-progress, 
completed, published, under review, etc.).  That has no effect on the 
visibility of a record in the public interface, but allows us to record the 
workflow state of a resource record in one field and the audience/visibility in 
another.

I'm also curious how others keep track of the publish/unpublish status on 
records that may contain a mix of published and unpublished archival objects. 
It would be nice if there was a way to know (at the top level) if a resource 
contained unpublished descendants, or if there was a way to quickly view all of 
the unpublished archival objects in any given resource record. As far as I can 
tell you can do an advanced search to locate all unpublished archival objects, 
but there is no obvious way to limit that search to a particular resource.

-Noah

================
Noah Huffman
Archivist for Metadata, Systems, and Digital Records
David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library
Duke University | 919-660-5982
http://library.duke.edu/rubenstein/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Flibrary.duke.edu-252Frubenstein-252F-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cbthomas-2540tsl.texas.gov-257C6e19455dbaae4ca5842408d6197a40da-257Ca4597bff9f384145a0334a2168399a5e-257C0-257C0-257C636724410210278412-26sdata-3DITwIeJKvxl3wQ25VbQtDPbpEJTyDLV1fvhdXXSBOJxk-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMFAg&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=P54V6LrXJP5Ddzc8ZItBdqB1Kr3elvFIQ04P7n0UCbQ&m=wXWWUted2bfeFlf8v-RL-LFPSbkncZiHLV7yaSspRB0&s=zoDO-h_DEIlWF8RDZhjFfAXUxQ7r25uVUvi6D4UNeoo&e=>




From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
 On Behalf Of Kennedy, Nancy
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 8:21 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group 
(archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>)
 
<archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Publish All workflows

Hello all,
We have had a few cases where users hit the 'Publish All' button for 
collections containing 'internal' archival_objects or notes (i.e. where the EAD 
@audience is "internal").

I wonder how other institutions handle collections with 'internal' content?  
What workflows or fail-safes do you use?  Given that publish all can result in 
thousands of internal ao or notes flipping to public, without an easy undo, I 
wonder what kinds of plugins or workflow steps we can take to prevent this 
happening again.

In our situation, an ideal solution would be to separate 'publish' into 2 
distinct checkboxes : one for status (publish true/false) and one for audience 
(internal / external).  Which would of course be quite involved.  It does 
however seem like it would be helpful all around if 'Publish?' vs 'Audience?' 
could be separate elements, so that I can protect internal audience material 
from publishing.

What do you all think?

Nancy


Nancy Kennedy
Smithsonian Institution
kenne...@si.edu<mailto:kenne...@si.edu>

_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Reply via email to