It does give one data point though for me. how well folks are listening to their mentors :)
-- dims On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/10/16 Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>: >> Well, in Apache terms it would be "consensus has not been reached"... >> For any relevant vote, which is Yes/No, this vote would fail ("more >> positive than negative"), but it is not a Yes/No vote, and hence the >> outcome is "undetermined" in my opinion. >> >> I have not voted on the basis that; >> >> a. Bike Shedding, >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_Law_of_Triviality > > Not seen that before. I agree it would seem that applies here. > >> b. Not sure if the content needs long term preservation or not. > > Would be nice but not essential as anything that is crucial > documentation should be moved over to the project doc. > >> c. Why does people even argue over it? >> >> Solution? Do both? Does it matter? > > Agreed, in hindsight, IMHO a vote probably wasn't needed because we > can just do both. > > Jeremy > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
