On Fri October 16 2009 6:18:55 am Davanum Srinivas wrote: > It does give one data point though for me. how well folks are > listening to their mentors :)
Yea. No kidding. If you look at just the IPMC binding votes, you get: +1 - none +0 - Guillaume Nodet -1 x 5 - Bertrand Delacretaz, Daniel Kulp, Kevan Miller, Davanum Srinivas, Alan Cabrera That's pretty one sided. If you ask me, it says something about how well people are grasping (or not) the Apache community aspects of things. Little red flags start popping up.... not good..... Dan > > -- dims > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2009/10/16 Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>: > >> Well, in Apache terms it would be "consensus has not been reached"... > >> For any relevant vote, which is Yes/No, this vote would fail ("more > >> positive than negative"), but it is not a Yes/No vote, and hence the > >> outcome is "undetermined" in my opinion. > >> > >> I have not voted on the basis that; > >> > >> a. Bike Shedding, > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_Law_of_Triviality > > > > Not seen that before. I agree it would seem that applies here. > > > >> b. Not sure if the content needs long term preservation or not. > > > > Would be nice but not essential as anything that is crucial > > documentation should be moved over to the project doc. > > > >> c. Why does people even argue over it? > >> > >> Solution? Do both? Does it matter? > > > > Agreed, in hindsight, IMHO a vote probably wasn't needed because we > > can just do both. > > > > Jeremy > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
