William Herrin wrote: > ... > > That having been said, this is 2013 not 1996. Justified need and free > market are opposite sides of a partisan divide. Your draft takes a > position.
from where i sit, jason's draft takes ARIN's position, both current and prior. > Something in such major contention can't possibly be a *current* > guiding principle. Think about it. Partisan divide and guiding > principle are on opposite ends of the spectrum. i disagree that current guiding principles are by definition noncontentious. if you would like to test the waters regarding a change to ARIN's guiding principle in the future, there's a policy process available to you. but hijacking a relatively tame proposal which would merely keep the status quo, because here and now is a convenient place and time to advance your own cause, is unprofessional. paul _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
