On Jun 13, 2013 12:18 AM, "Paul Vixie" <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > > > > William Herrin wrote: > > ... > > > > That having been said, this is 2013 not 1996. Justified need and free > > market are opposite sides of a partisan divide. Your draft takes a > > position. > > from where i sit, jason's draft takes ARIN's position, both current and > prior. > > > Something in such major contention can't possibly be a *current* > > guiding principle. Think about it. Partisan divide and guiding > > principle are on opposite ends of the spectrum. > > i disagree that current guiding principles are by definition noncontentious. > > if you would like to test the waters regarding a change to ARIN's > guiding principle in the future, there's a policy process available to you. > > but hijacking a relatively tame proposal which would merely keep the > status quo, because here and now is a convenient place and time to > advance your own cause, is unprofessional. > > paul >
I would say status quo is not tame. Cameron _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.