On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:49 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/26/13 11:14 , William Herrin wrote: >>> I think there are even higher principle that we should be considering, >>> such as > >>> - Network operators, public or private, are entitled to unique Internet >>> number resource from the Internet Registry System to connect users (or >>> consumers) and devices to the Internet. >> >> Are these not matters of network infrastructure policy outside ARIN's >> scope? > > Maybe the first one is, but if the second one is then why does the registry > even exist?
Right, my mistake, I misread the second one. I would restate the second one as: Sustainability. The registry's process must assure that number resources remain available to registrants throughout the life cycle of the protocols which use them. Does that acceptably capture your point? Thanks, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
