On 06/25/2013 20:11, David Farmer wrote:
2) Do you support the principle of hierarchical aggregation
(Routability)?
Yes, however the need for hierarchical aggregation should be less about
who should or shouldn't get allocations and more about ensuring that
subsequent allocations are aggregateable with previous allocations to
the greatest extent possible. This is exemplified by sparse allocation
within IPv6.
+1
I gave this a flat-out "no" when I answered, but I now realize that
David has raised an excellent caveat that I agree with. My opinion is a
bit more stringent: Aggregability is useful; *hierarchical*
aggregability, as was originally envisioned for IPv6, has turned out to
be not useful.
michael
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
