On 7/12/13 10:37 , Jason Schiller wrote:
David,
I took the liberty or changing the subject to "Fair Distribution" in
order to make this a
completely separate thread allowing the other conversation to continue
(possibly at a later
time) without getting tangled up with this one.
Thanks
Comments in line,
__Jason
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:58 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
...
So how do we move forward? I suggest;
1. Can everyone concede that going forward, conservation is much
less important, but that the need for some concept of conservation
doesn't completely go away either.
Assuming this is true, then the section on stewardship and balancing
allows for the community to find the right level, and modify ARIN
policy accordingly.
Yes, exactly
2. Lets focus the conversation on other issues for a while, let this
cool down a little, then come back to it after we've cooled down and
maybe have resolved some of the other issues.
Personally, I'm hoping to see the staff assessment soon, and hoping we
can make a list
of all the current practices that would be modified if this draft policy
is implemented,
and try to make sure the community aggress those practices should not change
and modify the draft accordingly.
The AC has a call next week, I'm sure we will discuss this. But, Chris
is the Shepherd and I'll let him take the lead on that.
3. Are there other concepts, principles, or goals that were missing?
I suggested earlier that there were additional principles we
should be looking at. An candidates has come up in the conversation
today that I would like to propose;
0.2 Fair Distribution
The principle of Fair Distribution is the precept that the
fundamental purpose of Internet number resources management is to
distributed unique number resources in a fair and impartial manner
to entities building and operating networks, for benefit of all
Internet users equally, and thereby facilitating the growth and
sustainability of the Internet.
I would not oppose the suggested text.
I think it probably needs more work, but I'll leave that in Chris'
capable hands as shepherd. I just want to start the discussion, I'm
interested in what others think too.
I'd make this #2 behind Registration, and I'd suggest Conservation
could follow and ties into this principle through the concepts of
"fairness" and "sustainability"
I'm not sure ordering matters...
From a technical perspective, no ordering doesn't mater.
These are not stack ranked where the most important principle is followed
to the detriment of the others. Hence the section on stewardship and
suggestion of balancing.
But OK, if the community wants it to be #2 I see no issue.
However, from an emotional perspective and how people interrupt the
narrative it does mater.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: [email protected]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
