On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:59:36 -0500
Lee Dilkie <l...@dilkie.com> wrote:
On 2/12/2014 14:44, John Curran wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Lee Dilkie <l...@dilkie.com> wrote:
The authorities very much DO want to know where to look and would like to
have accurate registration records... "Accurate" in this case can be
construed as "reflecting reality".
Lee -
That is very much the case (the desire for accurate records), but it
actually proves the
point in that the authorities still don't transfer your registration to the
thief in possession
simply to better "reflect reality".
Do you think that IF there was a physical limit to be number of cars in the
country, AND we were approaching that limit AND there existed a small number
of VERY LARGE taxicab companies, would a needs test be instituted? How about
for people that already have cars? How about people that have several? I
expect
the debate would get complicated, as this one has over the last few years.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Not really sure you got my point... There is no "needs" test for me to
transfer ownership of my car to you and the province cannot step in and
stop it, they are only interested in keeping their records straight....
so they know who to send the bill to every year (and so the police have
accurate records for those speed cameras).
As, I think is being suggested, ARIN should be doing as it's primary
mission.
-lee
Larry Ash
Network Administrator
Mountain West Telephone
123 W 1st St.
Casper, WY 82601
Office 307 233-8387
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
