Oh, BTW....I don't have any problem with increasing from 2 to 3, but am against it for more....and, I may be willing to carve out an exception for Caribbean communities still encumbered by limited competition. There, have a public exchange already in existence may support future competition. I'd be very interested to hear from our colleagues in that sub-region.
bd On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibr...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Mar 10, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Michael Peddemors <mich...@linuxmagic.com> > wrote: > > > >> On 14-03-10 09:05 AM, David Huberman wrote: > >> Michael Peddemors wrote: > >> > >>> >While on the surface this might seem prudent, it may be onerous for > smaller players. > >>> >More information might be needed to determine adverse cases, or > possibly some > >>> >exemption for rural players that might not be able to attain a 3rd > participant. > >> Is a public exchange point really a public exchange point if there are > only 2 participants? Isn't that just private peering for the time during > which no one else participates? I'm not seeing the public good, justifying > the draw down of a /24 from the public free pool, for two participants. > > > > Understood, however the smaller regional players might want to get this > in place for the future, when possibly additional peers may come available. > > > > Just playing the devil's advocate, but that is the only reason I can see > for not increasing it to three or more.. > > Any reason two small rural players shouldn't start with a PA /30 and > renumber into a larger block if/when they get a third participant? > > Unless someone has a good argument for why that's an excessive burden, > support changing 2 to 3. > > Scott > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.