> On Apr 30, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Andrew Dul <andrew....@quark.net> wrote:
>
>> On 4/30/2014 4:50 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Andrew Dul <andrew....@quark.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/30/2014 1:55 PM, sandrabr...@ipv4marketgroup.com wrote:
>>>> BUT: With the limitation of the transfer size to a /16 or smaller, it
>>>> would take a lot of transfers to hoard. It would take 256 transfers to
>>>> stockpile a /8. This is the 2nd means to prevent hoarding. Most
>>>> companies wanting that many IP's would simply do needs justification.
>>> It seems trivial to me to divide a /8 into /16s or any other smaller
>>> block so I could transfer it without doing the needs justification. I
>>> could write a script for the transfer templates and just send them off.
>>> Once the legwork for the first transfer is complete, the rest should
>>> just flow right through. Nothing I see in the current text or policy
>>> prevents someone from taking a larger block and slicing it up to get
>>> under the /16 limit. Since most of the brokers are out speculating that
>>> these blocks have significant value it seems clear that if the large
>>> players need them they will just be paying a staff person a few extra
>>> hours to manage this overhead.
>> Current transfer policy operates on the *recipient* of the transfer. It
>> requires that they meet their need with a single block, and prevents
>> repeated transfers to circumvent that.
>>
>>
> Conditions on recipient of the transfer:
> The recipient must demonstrate the need for up to a 24-month supply of IP
> address resources under current ARIN policies and sign an RSA.
> The resources transferred will be subject to current ARIN policies.
>
>
> Scott, I don't see any restrictions on the recipient that would prevent them
> from receiving multiple blocks...where do you see that?
It's hiding in 4.1.8:
Repeated requests, in a manner that would circumvent 4.1.6, are not allowed: an
organization may only receive one allocation, assignment, or transfer every 3
months, but ARIN, at its sole discretion, may waive this requirement if the
requester can document a change in circumstances since their last request that
could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time of the original request,
and which now justifies additional space.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
