-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Kargel
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:13 PM
To: David Huberman ; John Curran
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net List (arin-ppml@arin.net)
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-20: Transfer PolicySlow
Start and Simplified Needs Verification
John, we're on the same page here, I think.
> I am not for or against the present approach, but want to understand
> the community thinking on why enterprises should be prevented from
> doing transfers and subject to architecture-specific constraints in
> order to receive approval.
No one participating in the RIR system should be prevented from doing any
bona fide transfer. In the 8.3 world, network operators must be free to
buy
and sell IP addresses as it fits their business plans. If we can agree on
that,
can we agree that any mechanism which forces a company to do multiple
transfers or buy multiple blocks is a disservice to the community?
I for one do not agree with this. ARIN is in the business of supporting
networks and network operators and doing a fine job of it. ARIN has no
place supporting commodity sales.
Kevin
Hi Kevin,
ARIN is not supporting network operators by forcing them into more expensive
and fraught transfer options.
Nor by preventing initial allocations via transfer.
Regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
