Question for ARIN: Is whether Micro Allocation v4 address space sparsely allocated or not a policy or administrative question?
Best, -M< On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/22/14, 10:56 AM, Andrew Dul wrote: >> >> >> At the Chicago meeting there was some discussion around the >> micro-allocation policy (section 4.4) of the NRPM. I committed to the >> AC to produce a draft update to this section based upon feedback that I >> heard from the community. Below you will find a draft update. > > > > As someone who just completed a 4.4 request I didn't feel there was anything > broken about existing policy that warrants fixing. > > The only thing I'd support is removal of the fees statement, which I agree > is no-op language. However, you do not address 6.10, which has similar > language. If you're going to change 4.4 you also need to address 6.10. > > ~Seth > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
