(cross posted from NANOG)
Greetings:
In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a
number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI Relying
Agreement. Acceptance of this agreement is required in order to gain
access to ARIN's Trust Anchor Locator (TAL).
Given the size and number of these organizations that can't or wont
accept the agreement makes me wonder if this is a show stopper that will
prevent the adoption of this technology.
I've created a quick survey to get an idea of the community's take on
this agreement with the idea that if enough organizations indicate it is
unacceptable, maybe we can get this agreement changed, or as with other
regions, not explicitly required to use the TAL.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10RLBBpL05n1c_H4unHitlsVqNM3rZI5aXAX8iSBc_Kk/viewform?usp=send_form
Thank you
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
