On Dec 4, 2014, at 10:51 AM, David Huberman <david.huber...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > Numerous members of the security and network engineering community and I have > discussed this over the last 12 months, and the RPA is a show stopper for > some of us. Paragraphs 3 and 4 are the key. It's one way warranties (you -> > ARIN), just like the RSA. > > It's thorny because if you put yourself in ARIN's shoes for a moment, you > have to balance the risk of bankrupting the company with the responsibility > of being a trust anchor. Unfortunately, like many ARIN legal postures, the > unwillingness to take on any risk at all is problematic.
Actually, the terms regarding indemnification and warrant disclaimer are nearly identical to that contained in the other RIR's RPKI agreements; are those also problematic, or is the difficultly that principally that ARIN agreeing to the terms explicit rather than implicit? Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
