> On Jul 22, 2015, at 6:37 AM, David Huberman <david.huber...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > What if ARIN had a staffer conduct a long form interview with each of the > Board candidates during the campaign window, and publish the interview to > PPML or wherever? That would allow incumbents to be asked some difficult > questions and provide meaningful answers. It would also allow new candidates > to speak directly, in long form, and allow them to differentiate themselves > from incumbents. > This would ideally be done and published in the first week or two of the > campaign phase.
In the current process, this interview/questionnaire is done by the nomcom. Questions are proposed by the public, edited or consolidated as appropriate by the nomcom, posed to candidates, and the responses are published to the web site. Can you elaborate on what you see as the significances of the differences you’re proposing? https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/elec_procedures.html#botcv https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/candidate_bios.pdf -Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
