> On Jul 22, 2015, at 7:07 AM, David Huberman <david.huber...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> In the current process, this interview/questionnaire is done by the nomcom. >> Questions are proposed by the public, edited or consolidated as appropriate >> by the nomcom, posed to candidates, and the responses are published to >> the web site. >> >> Can you elaborate on what you see as the significances of the differences >> you’re proposing? >> >> https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/elec_procedures.html#botcv >> >> https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/candidate_bios.pdf > > > You're right - my idea overlaps the current questionnaire too much.
I wasn’t criticizing your suggestion, I’m sure the current process can be
improved (and this is a great time to do so, since we’re right at the beginning
of the nomcom process for this year). I just wanted to try to get the gist of
what you felt needed to be prioritized.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
