Hello

We are getting ready to lose a /22 and /23 and 2 /24's when we switch from microwave data center providers to fiber for our ISP that the data centers have been providing for us since the dial-up days . /22 and /23 are no longer available. Will we have to pay the $100 annual fee on each /24 block allocated even though nothing larger is available? Can we get an IPv6 allocation large enough when we file for AS number
for a several month cross over from microwave to fiber?

Thank you
Paul McNary
Internet Associates







On 8/11/2015 9:29 PM, j...@rowenetworks.com wrote:
Well here's my scenario. My ISP is in the process of acquiring another ISP, I wrote into arin for advice of how to go about requesting additional ip space as the acquisition will take more IP addresses then what we have left out of our current /21 allotment.

I was advised to apply asap however with the depletion procedures/protocols it didn't seem likely to quickly be able to get enough blocks from the free pool.

If an existing service provider such as myself would be able to get a free ipv6 allocation I would agree it would help transition to ipv6 faster as I need more IPs for my customers, infrastructure, etc.

I'd at least be more willing to try to make it work for my customer ip space since there would be little or no cost involved, now the problem that remains is the equipment compatibility and third party support of ipv6.

Is it possible to still get a block to use for my ISP for $100/yr?

Best Regards,
Josh Rowe


On August 11, 2015 10:11:40 PM EDT, Randy Carpenter <rcar...@network1.net> wrote:

    ----- On Aug 11, 2015, at 8:43 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:

        On 8/11/15 14:43, Alfie Cleveland wrote:

            Hello, I’m requesting comment in regards to automatically
            make organisations eligible for IPv6 if they hold
            justified IPv4 space. This similar to Section 9.3.1. of
            the [APNIC-127] APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies. I
            feel that if organisations were able to receive a /48 for
            each /24 they hold, then it would help expedite the
            rollout of IPv6. Organisations currently have two choices
            - continue to use IPv4, or spend valuable time on applying
            for IPv6 space. IPv6 space is clearly in abundance - and
            this could potentially help slo w the exhaustion of IPv4.

        I got my /32 IPv6 allocation in late 2009 and end user /48 in
        2007 and I don't remember having to do much to qualify for
them other than ask. Has this changed?

    No. If you have IPv4 space already, it is incredibly easy to get IPv6. 
Getting the default /48 as an end-user is about as automatic as it could be, 
and qualifying for more is not much more effort if you have multiple sites.

    The only issue is that for end-users, you now have to pay an additional 
$100 per year for the IPv6 assignment.

    -Randy
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PPML
    You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
    Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    Please contact i...@arin.net if you experi
      ence
    any issues.

-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to