While I understand that this applies in the general case, I think that with 
these reserved blocks, the situation is somewhat different.

First, the reserved blocks are limited to a very select set of purposes 
(high-level nameservers, internet exchange points, etc.).
With the exception of 4.10 (IPv6 transition), they are not even available to 
the average business under most circumstances.

Further, they are not issued as large blocks. IIRC, the largest possible 
allocation for any of the blocks is a /22.

If ARIN won’t process a transfer, then there’s virtually no ability to monetize 
the space in any useful way. Especially if the theoretical recipient is able to 
come to ARIN and get equivalent space essentially for free.

If the exchange point ceases to exist or the high-level nameserver is 
eliminated, that’s a fairly visible event which would allow ARIN sufficient 
verifiable information on which to base a decision to return the addresses to 
the free pool.

Owen

> On May 8, 2016, at 20:02 , Justin Wilson <li...@mtin.net> wrote:
> 
> The key will be making it where it can not be monetized.  It’s like Real 
> Estate and have to approach it like eminent domain.   I think it becomes a 
> very slippery slope. IP space, has become an monetary asset to the company.  
> If you remove the ability to capitalize on that unused space, you still need 
> a mechanism for forcing it’s return.
> 
> 
> Justin Wilson
> j...@mtin.net <mailto:j...@mtin.net>
> 
> ---
> http://www.mtin.net <http://www.mtin.net/> Owner/CEO
> xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
> 
> http://www.midwest-ix.com <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>  COO/Chairman
> Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
> 
>> On May 8, 2016, at 9:23 PM, Christoph Blecker <cblec...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:cblec...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I can't quite imagine a scenario that would merit an 8.3 transfer of 
>> reserved pool IP space. I think the community is better served to encourage 
>> reserved pool address holders to return the space back to the reserved pool 
>> if the need they originally requested the address space for no longer 
>> exists. As such, I prefer the original policy text.
>> 
>> I'd be open to changing my opinion if someone could explain a scenario where 
>> an 8.3 transfer is preferable to requesting space from the free pool.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Christoph
>> 
>> On 5 May 2016 at 12:11, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com 
>> <mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
>> Speaking strictly for myself and not as a member of the AC…
>> 
>> I still fail to see the need for this. Here are the scenarios I can see:
>> 
>> 1.   Transfer of an operating environment to a new organization through 
>> merger/acquisition/reorg:
>> 
>>              This would be handled in 8.2 and there is no restriction on 
>> these blocks in 8.2
>>              transfers.
>> 
>> 2.   Creation of a new operational environment which needs resources and 
>> qualifies:
>> 
>>              Since these reserved pools still have resources available, I 
>> see no reason to support
>>              their transfer through 8.3 or 8.4.
>> 
>> I think the proposed change would be mostly harmless, but I also feel that 
>> it serves no useful purpose and would complicate policy unnecessarily.
>> 
>> Further, unlike larger blocks of resources, these blocks are assigned in 
>> very small chunks and for a very specific purpose. Once that purpose no 
>> longer exists, their return should be straightforward and we as a community 
>> should be able to expect voluntary return of these addresses as they cannot 
>> be monetized, cannot be transferred, and cannot be repurposed. (At least not 
>> without violating policy).
>> 
>> Owen
>> 
>>> On May 5, 2016, at 07:59 , Andrew Dul <andrew....@quark.net 
>>> <mailto:andrew....@quark.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> As part of the discussions at ARIN 37 the community considered updates to 
>>> the proposed draft policy that would allow organizations to transfer, 
>>> within ARIN, reserved pool resources provided that they met the criteria to 
>>> obtain a block from a reserved pool. 
>>> Based upon this feedback we are proposing to update the draft policy text 
>>> as follows.  The AC welcomes your feedback on this proposed text and any 
>>> other feedback on this draft policy.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Andrew
>>> 
>>> Original Policy statement:
>>> Add to Section 8.3 and Section 8.4 under the "Conditions on source of the 
>>> transfer:"
>>> 
>>> Address resources from a reserved pool (including those designated in 
>>> Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer.
>>> 
>>> Updated Policy statement:
>>> 
>>> Add to Section 8.3 under the "Conditions on recipient of the transfer:"
>>> 
>>> Address resources from a reserved pool (including those designated in 
>>> Section 4.4 and 4.10) shall only be transferred to organizations which meet 
>>> the current criteria of the reserved pool from which the resource was 
>>> obtained.
>>> 
>>> Add to Section 8.4 under the "Conditions on source of the transfer:"
>>> Address resources from a reserved pool (including those designated in 
>>> Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PPML
>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net 
>>> <mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net>).
>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml 
>>> <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>>> Please contact i...@arin.net <mailto:i...@arin.net> if you experience any 
>>> issues.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net 
>> <mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml 
>> <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact i...@arin.net <mailto:i...@arin.net> if you experience any 
>> issues.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net 
>> <mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml 
>> <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to