I support the policy changes as written. José
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:55 PM, ARIN <i...@arin.net> wrote: > Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1 > Reserved Pool Transfer Policy > > On 17 March 2016 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-226 > Reserved Pool Transfer Policy" as a Draft Policy. > > Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1 is below and can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_1.html > > You are encouraged to discuss the merits and your concerns of Draft > Policy 2016-1 on the Public Policy Mailing List. > > The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance > of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet Number Resource > Policy as stated in the PDP. Specifically, these principles are: > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > * Technically Sound > * Supported by the Community > > The ARIN Policy Development Process (PDP) can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html > > Regards, > > Communications and Member Services > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > ## * ## > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2016-1 > Reserved Pool Transfer Policy > > Date: 22 March 2016 > > Problem Statement: > > Section 8 of the current NRPM does not distinguish between the transfer of > blocks from addresses that have been reserved for specific uses and other > addresses that can be transferred. In sections 4.4 and 4.10 there are > specific address blocks set aside, based on the need for critical > infrastructure and IPv6 transitions. Two issues arise if transfers of > reserved address space occur under the current language of section 8. > First, if transfers of 4.4 or 4.10 space occur under the current policy > requirements set forth in sections 8.3 and 8.4, the recipients will be able > to acquire space that was originally reserved for a specific purpose > without ever providing evidence that they will be using the space for > either critical infrastructure or IPv6 transition. Second, if we allow an > allocation or assignment from the block reserved in section 4.10 to be > transferred out of the region, it would complicate the single aggregate > from which providers are being asked to allow in block sizes smaller than a > /24. This policy would limit the transfer of addresses from reserved pools. > > Policy statement: > > Add to Section 8.3 and Section 8.4 under the "Conditions on source of the > transfer:" > > Address resources from a reserved pool (including those designated in > Section 4.4 and 4.10) are not eligible for transfer. > > Timetable for implementation: Immediate > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.