In message <[email protected]>, [email protected] wrote:
>Our choices with this Draft Policy: > >1) Reject it because it does not completely eliminate the abuse, and allow >the current policy (with ALL its abuse) to continue. > >or > >2) Adopt the policy even though not perfect at eliminating ALL the abuse, >but does cut back much of it. Please allow me to note that there is also a third option: 3) Adopt the policy, but select some different default allocation size, other than /22. Personally, I think that a /22 is the Wrong Way To Go and it would be better to change that to a single /24. I mean what do people even need lots of IPv4 for anymore anyway? A single web server with a single IPv4 address can easily support tens of thousands of distinct and unique web sites. A single mail server on a single IPv4 address can likewise support mail services for tens of thousands of recipient and sender domain names. A single name server on a single IPv4 address can also provide DNS service for tens of thusands of domain names. For anyone needing to support big batches of end-luser clients, there is IPv6. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
