On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 1:41 PM ARIN <i...@arin.net> wrote: > Businesses have a need to lease IPv4 space for limited periods of time, > as evidenced by a robust (technically prohibited) subleasing market. The > lack of legitimization of the subleasing market hinders innovation, > research, reporting, and the development of rules/industry best > practices to ensure identifiability and contactability. >
Devil's advocate: *should* the subleasing market be marginalized and illegitimate? What is it about the behavior of organizations leasing IP addresses absent network service which is not basically doing ARIN's job but for more money and with less oversight? Serious question; not meant to be rhetorical. I want to hear what sort of address leasing independent of connectivity is not the job ARIN is tasked with. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin b...@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
