> On Sep 30, 2019, at 11:02 , Mike Burns <m...@iptrading.com> wrote: > > Hi Fernando, > > You said “RIR is and has always been the one who drives the resources to be > efficientlly assigned by analysing justifications not private transfer > companies. If an organization is not using resouces efficiently it either may > change its resource assignment strategy otherwise it doesn't justify for > those addresses anymore and should return them back to the RIR.” > > There is no policy in ARIN to return un-needed space. IPv4 resource holders > own something of value, which is what economists call an “alienable asset”. > It is possible for such resource holders to return such space to ARIN, but > you don’t have to be an economist to understand why they don’t and haven’t > for the most part.
Mike, I refer you to ARIN RSA Version 12.0 Section 7: 7. NO PROPERTY RIGHTS Holder acknowledges and agrees that: (a) the Included Number Resources are not property (real, personal, or intellectual) of Holder; (b) Holder does not and will not have or acquire any property rights in or to Included Number Resources by virtue of this Agreement; (c) Holder will not attempt, directly or indirectly, to obtain or assert any patent, trademark, service mark or copyright in any number resources in the United States or any other country; and (d) Holder will transfer or receive Included Number Resources in accordance with the Policies. Owen
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
