In message <23f8704f-c807-4e5d-b8a3-947eabcbe...@delong.com>, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote:
>> At the end of the day, any applicant can design some technical >> concoction which artificially requires IP addresses. > >Yes, but that’s not what we are talking about here. In reality, what we are >talking about is seeing if there is a way to remove an artificial concocted >policy requirement without opening up major abuse potential. My apologies for being repetitive, but I'd like to just interject, again, that in the absense of any evidence that the existing (alleged) policy has ever been persuasively enforced, it would appear that this so-called "major abuse potential" already exists, and likely has existed, for some considerable time now. If the existing policy were rescinded tomorrow, would that event result in hoards of Bad Actors suddenly coming out of the woodwork and doing all manner of evil things that they did not already feel adeequately empowered to do yesterday with abject impunity? Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
