On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Owen DeLong wrote:
Actually, technically, Windows NT would meet the requirement in this
proposal. It just couldn’t resolve DNS over IPv6.
I remember patching complete, functional v6 support into my 2.4.18 linux
kernels, but it looks like the first v6 code appeared in 2.1.8, circa
1996:
https://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/ch02s02.html
Looks like OpenVMS has has support since '03 or so, which is mostly
concurrent with support in the mainline Linux kernel.
Scott
Owen
On Nov 6, 2019, at 11:40 , hostmas...@uneedus.com wrote:
Also, you can under this proposal still have that Windows 3.1 workstation, or
even a DOS workstation using packet drivers.
All it says is that 1) You have an IPv6 Assignment or Allocation from ARIN, and
2) You have at least ONE workstation on it that is capable of communicating
using that IPv6 address space with ARIN.
It is NOT a requirement to place IPv6 everywhere in your network, although in
todays world that is getting to be more and more desirable.
And just FYI, there is a third party winsock that will allow you to use that
workstation on an IPv6 network, along with packet drivers for dos, that also
use IPv6. Windows has had IPv6 support since W2K, almost 20 years ago. This
requirement is NOT a hardship, just a friendly jolt in the correct direction
for the future.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, scott wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Michel Py wrote:
I oppose this proposal. If I am ever in a position where ARIN is trying to
force me to request or use IPv6, I will sue ARIN for imposing an undue burden.
What do you normally do when hardware or software hits EOL?
I am serious. If ARIN generates more work for me, I will explore all options to
be compensated.
Look, you are free to run Windows 3.1 on your 10BASE2 network, if that makes less work
for you, and less work is a variable you optimize for in your networks. This is,
however, 2019. IPv6 has been around for a while. IPv4 has been officially depleted for
years now. IPv4 being considered the "legacy Internet" is not that many years
away. Is it more work to get ahead of the curve, or play catch up?
Michel.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
