No problem. However under this policy draft, you would no longer receive
any additional IPv4 addresses from ARIN. Further, getting a court order
to split the registry apart is even a greater stretch.
I have legacy stuff. However I have also had IPv6 since 2007. It was
initially done as a federal requirement, have it or no federal business.
This proposal is much of the same.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Michel Py wrote:
sc...@solarnetone.org
What do you normally do when hardware or software hits EOL?
I keep it until I serves no purpose.
I repeat : ARIN will not force me to waste time filling IPv6 paperwork without
consequences.
If ARIN wants to go IPv6-only, there will be a nice case in court to split the
IPv4 part to another registry.
There is no law that says I need IPv6, therefore the courts will hear my case
for undue burden.
Michel.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
