On 1/3/20, 12:25 PM, "ARIN-PPML on behalf of Owen DeLong" 
<arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net on behalf of o...@delong.com> wrote:

    
    
    > On Dec 26, 2019, at 16:38 , Fernando Frediani <fhfredi...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
    > 
    > There are two points to analyze in this proposal:
    > 
    > - Any returned, reclaimed or revoked addresses that belong originally to 
the reserved pools to be returned to them. I think this was pretty obvious and 
was already done this way and wouldn't be necessary to state it again. Could 
the author show that this is not the way it is currently done then I am fine to 
support this part.
    
    Whether it is done this way or not, would be a question for the RSHD and/or 
John Sweeting. I honestly don’t know the current practice.

(JS)>>Yes, this is the way they are handled in current policy. All special 
reserved pool IPv4 addresses are returned to the pool they are reserved for. 
    
    However, codifying it in policy (it is not currently) is good either way as 
it provides clarity and ensures that it is done that way unless the community 
makes a deliberate change to the policy.
    
    > - With regards returning any other returned, reclaimed or revoked 
resources that were not from the reserved pools to them, although I see the 
good intent of it I find it difficult to support it as we don't know numbers 
related to this at the present. The numbers of assignments from these reserved 
pools, the amount available and the forecast for it are necessary for this 
analysis.
    
    The beauty of the way this proposal is structured is that it only 
replenishes those pools up to a historical 3-year supply.
    
    So, for example, if the last three years saw the distribution of 25, 60, 
and 80 /24 equivalents, then a 3-year supply would be considered to be 165 /24 
equivalents. As the sliding three-year look-back window changes, so would the 
amount of supply required to consider the pool “full”.
    
    > Also it seems that three-year supply a long time for it to be kept. If 
the numbers mentioned point to the direction of the need of replenishing for 
these pools then the it may be necessary to review and discuss the supply time 
better. Without this information I cannot support this part of the proposal yet.
    
    The information is probably available in the statistics on the ARIN web 
site. However, I agree that having staff provide more details would be useful 
in informing the discussion here. I will make a formal request.

(JS)>>The stats for 4.4. 

Year    # IX     # CI

2013    12      1
2014    21      0
2015    15      3
2016    7       2
2017    17      8
2018    19      0
2019    18      0

The stats for 4.10

2015    12
2016    62
2017    139
2018    230
2019    260


    
    Owen
    
    > 
    > Regards
    > Fernando
    > 
    > On 24/12/2019 11:41, ARIN wrote:
    >> 
    >> On 19 December 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted 
"ARIN-prop-281: Reserved Pool Replenishment" as a Draft Policy.
    >> 
    >> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-21 is below and can be found at:
    >> 
    >> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_21/
    >> 
    >> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will 
evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft policy 
with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the 
Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:
    >> 
    >> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
    >> * Technically Sound
    >> * Supported by the Community
    >> 
    >> The PDP can be found at:
    >> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/
    >> 
    >> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
    >> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/
    >> 
    >> Regards,
    >> 
    >> Sean Hopkins
    >> Policy Analyst
    >> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-21: Reserved Pool Replenishment
    >> 
    >> Problem Statement:
    >> 
    >> While the current level of resources in the reserve pools created in 
Sections 4.4 and 4.10 presently seem more than adequate for their intended 
purposes. Nevertheless, even these well-resourced pools will eventually run 
out. Therefore, we should make arrangements for their replenishment, if or when 
necessary.
    >> 
    >> Policy Statement:
    >> 
    >> Add a new subsection in IPv4 General Principles, Section 4.1;
    >> 
    >> 4.1.X Reserved Pool Replenishment
    >> 
    >> Any resources allocated from a reserved pool created in Sections 4.4 or 
4.10, or any other reserved pools created in the future, that are returned, 
reclaimed, or revoked will be returned to the reserved pool they were 
originally allocated from, regardless of the current level of each pool. 
Further, any other resources returned, reclaimed, or revoked will be 
prioritized for the replenishment of any reserved pool that falls below a 
running three-year supply, which is based on the previous three years of 
allocations from each pool.
    >> 
    >> Timetable for Implementation: Immediate
    >> 
    >> Anything Else:
    >> 
    >> ARIN Staff should regularly report on the levels and projected run-times 
for each reserved pool and immediately report when any reserved pool falls 
below a three-year running supply.
    >> 
    >> A three-year running supply was chosen to provide the ARIN Policy 
Community adequate time to react through policy, as deemed appropriate at that 
time, to an imminent run out event for one of the reserved pools.
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> ARIN-PPML
    >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
    >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    >> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
    > _______________________________________________
    > ARIN-PPML
    > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
    > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
    
    _______________________________________________
    ARIN-PPML
    You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
    Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
    

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to