Not quite what I had in mind. However, you demonstrated the point. Volume != substance. Personally, I find the AC to be too activist on occasion. However I see nothing that needs repair here. I applaud use of the petition process as it is part of the pdp. The petition itself, while long and detailed, lacks enough substance itself to make me want to support it. Your mileage may vary.
Warm regards, -M< On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:31 PM Tom Fantacone <t...@iptrading.com> wrote: > Well, since you asked, I do support the petition. > > Tom Fantacone > IPTrading.com > > ------- Original Message ------- > *From :* Martin Hannigan[mailto:hanni...@gmail.com] > *Sent :* 1/13/2021 5:20:04 PM > *To :* arin-ppml@arin.net > *Cc :* > *Subject :* RE: Re: [arin-ppml] Open Petition for ARIN-2020-2 > > > > Anyone else going to say it? > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 16:36 Annette Ogden < > annet...@anderson-electric.com> wrote: > >> I support this petition. >> >> >> >> *Annette Ogden* >> >> Anderson Electric, Inc. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >> > >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
