I think that should put to an all member vote on a matter like this.
They have so many damn mailings, it is done on purpose so that they can say it
was put out on this other mailing list.
Either that or campaign for new board members. And John just as well be
replaced also. He been there too long.
My math doesn't match Owen's ? math either.
From: "Mark McDonald" <ma...@siteserver.com>
To: "John Curran" <jcur...@arin.net>
Cc: "arin-ppml" <arin-ppml@arin.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:20:51 PM
Subject: {Spam?} Re: [arin-ppml] Open Letter Regarding 650% Rate-Hike for
Legacy Users
Hi John,
We must be looking at different fee charts. Can you send me the one you’re
referring to? We hold a /19 and fall under the “Small” service category, paying
roughly $0.12/IP/Year. Right off the bat, we’re in the same service category as
someone holding a /18, so we’re paying twice as much per IPv4 Resource as them
- but wait, it gets much, much better. Those holding a /8 are paying
$0.0038/IP/Year - *64X* less than our company per IPv4 resource. Someone over
there failed math class if the goal was to level the costs among all users.
If ARIN’s goal is to get everyone paying the same per/resource, our bill should
go down to $31.13/year so we’re paying the same per resource as those issued
/8’s. For an organization that’s trying to promote IP conservation, your
metrics show you’re promoting the opposite - the larger the block, the less I
pay.
I broke it all down for you here:
CIDR Number of IP's Service Category Fee Fee per/IPv4 (Resource) % of full cost
(/24) per/resource
/24 256 3X-Small $250.00 $0.9766
/23 512 2X-Small $500.00 $0.9766 100.00%
/22 1,024 2X-Small $500.00 $0.4883 50.00%
/21 2,048 X-Small $1,000.00 $0.4883 50.00%
/20 4,096 X-Small $1,000.00 $0.2441 25.00%
/19 8,192 Small $2,000.00 $0.2441 25.00%
/18 16,384 Small $2,000.00 $0.1221 12.50%
/17 32,768 Medium $4,000.00 $0.1221 12.50%
/16 65,536 Medium $4,000.00 $0.0610 6.25%
/15 131,072 Large $8,000.00 $0.0610 6.25%
/14 262,144 Large $8,000.00 $0.0305 3.13%
/13 524,288 X-Large $16,000.00 $0.0305 3.13%
/12 1,048,576 X-Large $16,000.00 $0.0153 1.56%
/11 2,097,152 2X-Large $32,000.00 $0.0153 1.56%
/10 4,194,304 2X-Large $32,000.00 $0.0076 0.78%
/9 8,388,608 3X-Large $64,000.00 $0.0076 0.78%
/8 16,777,216 3X-Large $64,000.00 $0.0038 0.39%
/7 33,554,432 4X-Large $128,000.00 $0.0038 0.39%
/6 67,108,864 4X-Large $128,000.00 $0.0019 0.20%
I sincerely hope ARIN re-thinks this before implementation. That’s what would
be fair and equitable for all.
-Mark McDonald
President/CEO
Siteserver, Inc.
On Sep 15, 2021, at 1:05 PM, John Curran < [ mailto:jcur...@arin.net |
jcur...@arin.net ] > wrote:
Mark -
In April of this year, we announced a consultation on the matter of harmonizing
ARIN’s fees and many of the issues you raised were discussed at that time on
the ARIN-consult mailing list - [
https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/2021-April/date.html |
https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/2021-April/date.html ]
As noted in that discussion, 3621 end-user customers will see their fees
decrease as a result of change. 4431 end-users (those with larger IP address
holdings) will see their fees increase. After the fee changes, all customers
will be paying the same fees based on their total IPv4 resources held.
Regarding ISP/EU fees distribution, note that ARIN’s expected total fees paid
in 2021 are approximately $21 million – with ISP’s paying the overwhelming
majority of the costs at approximately $17M annually.
Thanks,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers
On 15 Sep 2021, at 3:21 PM, Mark McDonald < [ mailto:ma...@siteserver.com |
ma...@siteserver.com ] > wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Mr. Curran,
It’s unfortunate to learn about ARIN’s proposal to increase our rates by 650%
from one year to the next from your EMail. It would have been nice to receive
this when this measure was being proposed. In looking through various member
forums, it appears we aren’t alone. While I can appreciate your desire to
standardize rates between End Users and ISP’s, it’s obvious that ARIN provides
a different set of services for ISP’s as it does End Users. For us, ARIN stores
< 50k of data in a database - similar to a Domain Registration from Network
Solutions. They’re somehow able to perform these services for about $9/year.
ARIN has historically charged us $300/year for this service, and is now raising
rates by 650% to $2000.00/year. And for what? The IPv4 pool is depleted so
there is no value in attempting to obtain additional IPv4 resources, while IPv6
resources are limitless, and are charged accordingly.
For End Users, there are no ongoing SWIP assignments or ongoing actions from
ARIN that require ARIN’s resources and for those that there are, ARIN charges
for those services (new assignments, transfers, etc). We maintain numerous
resources with ARIN through a different ISP account for resources used for ISP
services and pay fees (and utilize services) accordingly.
When ARIN, or any organizational body, sends out an email stating rates are
raising 650%, it makes me question how an organization that could do something
for a a set fee for so long suddenly can’t and needs to implement drastic
measures to “recoup” these fees. It wreaks of inefficiency as ARIN’s number of
resources managed is going up, not down and with any business, the cost to
provide services goes down as the number of customers (resources) goes up.
I was trying to look through the ARIN organizational documents and recent
Annual Reports to see how ARIN’s income is represented (percentage of ISP vs
End-User, RSP vs Non-RSP) as your Email lacks this important information,
however I was unable to find this. It would be much appreciated if you could
provide it. As a user of ARIN’s services, it would be nice to see exactly how
much of a rate increase this is (increasing ARIN revenue) vs standardizing
rates, which would re-rate *everybody* (raising some, lowering others) so that
ARIN’s revenue remained neutral while equally balancing costs to provide
services.
In owning and operating businesses in the IT space, I’ve always viewed ARIN as
a fair and equitable organization. Until today. Your email lacked critical
information that would have shown this as a “standardization of rates” vs a
rate hike on what appears to be all legacy customers. Perhaps the rates ARIN is
charging them isn’t too low, but the rates you’re charging ISP’s is too high,
or perhaps somewhere in between.
>From the Emails I’ve already received from other parties this affects, it
>appears the courts will ultimately decide what is legitimate and what is not,
>however I feel this could have all been avoided with better communication.
Sincerely,
Mark McDonald
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ( [ mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net |
ARIN-PPML@arin.net ] ).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
[ https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml |
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml ]
Please contact [ mailto:i...@arin.net | i...@arin.net ] if you experience any
issues.
BQ_END
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
