> On Sep 22, 2021, at 20:22 , William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 8:01 PM Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML > <arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote: >> I will note that most of the sections which specifically call out staff >> discretion or give staff discretion are more than 10 years old and that when >> same has come up almost any time in the last 10 years among the AC, the >> staff representative on the AC has requested that we minimize staff >> discretion in policies. > > > That's because staff discretion generally has to be interpreted in the > manner most favorable to the registrant. Unless the intent was to be > -more- permissive, which it usually isn't, that leads to results the > policy was supposed to prevent.
I don’t entirely disagree, but in the current context, that seems all the more reason that staff discretion in CW’s proposal(s) would be dysfunctional relative to stated intent. Owen _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
