William Herrin wrote:
OPPOSE.
<snip>
Also unclear why we should pretend that LIRs do a better job enforcing
ARIN policy on address registrants than ARIN itself does. A LIR
leasing arrangement delegates that responsibility from ARIN without,
to my view, any good cause.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
This is enough of a reason for me to oppose this change. Delegating
ARIN's role to LIR's absent technical needs would have to be on the
basis that it somehow improves IPv4 stewardship in a manner more
efficient and in-line with community goals and consensus. I think that
would be a high bar to meet.
Oppose.
Joe
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
