Mike -

  Speaking only as myself, and not as a member of the AC or the NomCom:

I hear your frustrations for transparency, and I have formulated a suggestion 
that I've shared with the NomCom to improve the way that candidate responses 
are handled.

To wit -

   I've suggested simple, impartial, boilerplate language that would be used 
for all candidates, to show where those candidates were marked as "needing 
additional improvement"

Examples of those areas were:
    ethics, business, governance, communication, finance, and education

There is obviously room for other areas.  I'd love to hear what your thoughts 
would be.

Thanks,
   Leif Sawyer

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to