Hi Brian,
This policy removes the circuit requirement but retains the requirement that blocks be used on operating networks. This policy only affects transferred (read “purchased”) addresses and I don’t see how it affects fair and impartial distribution, can you elucidate the manner in which fair and impartial distributions are affected by removing the circuit requirement? I don’t think the proposal would have been approved for discussion if it opposed fair and impartial distribution. Regards, Mike From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net> On Behalf Of Brian Jones Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 8:58 AM To: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml@arin.net> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised and Retitled - Draft Policy ARIN-2021-6: Permit IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilization for Future Allocations Speaking for myself, I oppose this policy if this is removed: “...entities building and operating networks…”. If you are not building and operating networks, what are the resources needed for? This policy seems to oppose the fair and impartial dissemination of Internet number resources for their intended purposes. - Brian On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:23 PM, ARIN <i...@arin.net <mailto:i...@arin.net> > wrote: Section 1.4 Stewardship Replace “The fundamental purpose of Internet number stewardship is to distribute unique number resources to entities building and operating networks thereby facilitating the growth and sustainability of the Internet for the benefit of all.” with “The fundamental purpose of Internet number stewardship is to distribute unique number resources to facilitate the growth and sustainability of the Internet for the benefit of all.”
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
