Hi Matthew Thank you so much for the update and community input consideration to that end.
Cheers Noah On Wed, 3 Aug 2022, 22:25 Matthew Wilder, <matthew.wil...@telus.com> wrote: > Hi PPML, > > I appreciate the lively discussion thus far on ARIN-2022-3, including > concerns around what prosecutorial powers might be lost if officer > attestations are no longer required. Thanks also to staff for summarizing > the result of the ACSP Consultation 2021.4 retiring the officer attestation > requirement for documentation of needs assessment. > > The prevailing concern in the community around ARIN-2022-3 appears to be > that removing officer attestation would impede the prosecution of those > conducting fraud. In order to have the experts address this concern, I > (along with my fellow policy shepherd Joe) have requested a staff and legal > review. Our hope is that staff (and legal counsel in particular) might > directly weigh in on how important the officer attestation is. > > We will make sure that relevant points are highlighted back to PPML for > the community to consider in further discussion of the draft policy. > > Warm regards, > > *Matthew Wilder* > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
